outrageous behavior

I am vegan for health, but I've been eating this way for over a year now. Curious about the ethics and production aspects surrounding the animal industry, I've read a number of well-known texts to learn more - including the occasional foray to the PETA site. I have not been in sympathy with their sexist marketing tactics, but - no, there is no 'but'. I am not in sympathy with their alienating and offensive tactics. I know all about the theory that shock brings attention, that old end-justifies-means argument that carries no water around this house.

How you live, who you are to your fellows - this counts. Every word you say, smiles, a hand when needed - these things construct your character over a very long time (if you're lucky). Small tradeoffs. Screwing someone over, expeditiously - the little-considered impulse to self defense. We do err. Trite thoughts come to me about repenting at leisure, and other bullshit. We do mess up. But an accretion of poor decisions - slight course adjustments - are capable of altering not only the path of the journey, but the point of arrival.

It is not enough, ever, to trade off human dignity no matter what the ends might ideally be. Today PETA attempted to run an ad following the beheading of a young man on a Greyhound bus. Intentionally, representatives of this organization created an ad modeled on this horrific crime, pointing out the horror of our slaughter of innocent animals. Their justification?

Yesterday, we mentioned an advertisement that we wanted to run in a Canadian newspaper in the wake of a shocking stabbing murder and possible cannibalism in Manitoba. Countless people have contacted us with their concerns, so we'd like to explain why we wanted to run the ad that no newspaper will touch with a 10' pole.

Yes, of course we were horrified (who wouldn't be?) when we heard the details of this barbaric, incomprehensible killing. And obviously, everyone's good thoughts go out to anyone affected by this violent act. That's all a no-brainer. Now, remember, PETA is known for being provocative—that's our job. The animals don't benefit from our silence. So our thought is always: How can we get people to see that despite their feelings about this kind of violence, they are often paying someone to do exactly what was done to the man on the bus, and worse, just so that they can eat a sandwich? Voila, the ad!

We see parallels between acts of violence against humans and cruelty to animals, since both spring from a common root. We understand that such comparisons may be uncomfortable for many people, but they're not inaccurate.

Responding to violence with anger is also natural, but just being angry solves nothing, does it? Real change comes about when we channel anger or sadness into action. (Quoted from here)

What will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? The exploitation of human pain only increases the pain, regardless of the validity of the objectives.

There is no guarantee that PETA's move will succeed in any way in convincing people that killing animals is wrong. I could not disagree more with PETA. My voice counts too, here in this strange country of blogging.


Meanwhile, my strong feeling is that I would like to send my caring thoughts and support towards the McLean family, who have lost their son, Tim. It is this loss that is even more incomprehensible and unbearable, and no political posturing should obscure the tragedy, or draw attention from it. As a parent I cannot begin to understand this loss, and it is in realizing my inability that I begin to sense the depth of the void that has been created.

Our responsibility to one another: to be kind. Isn't that all we've got?